Google Chrome now better than Firefox?

[Mako-Infused]

Like I said earlier (which you I guess didn't bother to read), I use BOTH and see no improvement in Chrome's speed. I'm not like you who most likely on uses the one browser and is just screaming "Hurrr chrome is faster dah googles told meh!!!! Hurrhurr dey rewrote da java stuffs!@!@"
And how is it safer? They're both open source, both are as vulnerable as the next... And considering that FireFox gets A LOT more updates, any security flaws that are ever found are patched extremely quickly, firefox is in no way 'unsafe'... So obviously, you DON'T know what you're talking about.
But I guess if you're definition of safe is "sending all my info to google" then you're right...? Again, you're a dumbass if you use chrome, and don't really know shit about what you're talking about... AT LEAST use iron.

Sorry bud, I argue when I'm right. But nice attempt at trying to get me to shut up?

Edit: Oh and for the record, just to back up my own arguments (for my own sake, obviously this isn't any solid proof), Loaded up both chrome and firefox, brought them both to google, then tested each one. I went to a site that I hadn't been to, so no cache or anything of the sort... Firefox took around 1 second to fully load & display it, whereas chrome took around 2.5, so please move along, thanks.

Its safer because less hackers target it, and less people use it. Firefox updates dont mean that it is any safer just means they are patching shit. And no your not right your actully wrong.
Your system as propably got a firewall which allows firefox through better than chrome. On all bench marks thorughout the PC sites chrome consistently shows as a faster browser. Your compute is not a benchmark is it??? so dont you that as a reasonable reason to say that chrome is slower. Also i doubt you actully know anything about browser security to actully make any come back to what i said about it, but in reason, the more popular a browser is the more it is easier for it to get explioted. IE > Firefox > what ever is next.

[WhoIsYou]

Its safer because less hackers target it, and less people use it. Firefox updates dont mean that it is any safer just means they are patching shit. And no your not right your actully wrong.
Your system as propably got a firewall which allows firefox through better than chrome. On all bench marks thorughout the PC sites chrome consistently shows as a faster browser. Your compute is not a benchmark is it??? so dont you that as a reasonable reason to say that chrome is slower. Also i doubt you actully know anything about browser security to actully make any come back to what i said about it, but in reason, the more popular a browser is the more it is easier for it to get explioted. IE > Firefox > what ever is next.

Less hackers targeting it doesn't make something safer. Being safe has to do with the actual coding not being crappy and vulnerable, genius. I really don't know what hackers you're talking about that are targeting firefox... There are no major exploits to firefox that would make you vuln (if ANY at all)... And you obviously didn't understand anything about what I was getting at about updates. The POINT was (since you can't comprehend simple things and need multiple explanations) that firefox gets updated EXTREMELY often, and if some exploit were to ever surface, it would most likely get patched EXTREMELY quickly, and we can't exactly say that about chrome (yet).
How would that firewall argument make any sort of sense? The firewall would either allow/deny access to the internet that's all, and even with the firewall entirely off, identical results, so there goes that argument.
And why could I not say chrome is slower? If it's slower for ME then it IS slower, you can't come tell me it's faster for me when I'm telling you it's SLOWER for ME. Also, show me some RECENT, I'm talking VERY VERY recent (such as within the last month) solid PROOF showing that chrome is actually faster as far as browsing goes... And not just some one site's/kid's little blog or video or anything, real proof.

I don't know browser security? What do YOU know about it? Most likely nothing... And making a comeback to what? You've said nothing other than "blarrr chrome fast!!! hurr chrome safe!!" with no proof of such.
And again, you're showing how little you know about this by saying that IE is unsafe just because it's popular. You obviously know nothing about what you argue about, IE is unsafe because of it's CRAPPY CODING, there are major flaws in it that ALLOW these exploits... Flaws that are so big that microsoft can't even patch them, if they wish to get rid of them they have to literally recode IE from scratch... Seriously, go read some shit before trying to argue something.