Less hackers targeting it doesn't make something safer. Being safe has to do with the actual coding not being crappy and vulnerable, genius. I really don't know what hackers you're talking about that are targeting firefox... There are no major exploits to firefox that would make you vuln (if ANY at all)... And you obviously didn't understand anything about what I was getting at about updates. The POINT was (since you can't comprehend simple things and need multiple explanations) that firefox gets updated EXTREMELY often, and if some exploit were to ever surface, it would most likely get patched EXTREMELY quickly, and we can't exactly say that about chrome (yet).
How would that firewall argument make any sort of sense? The firewall would either allow/deny access to the internet that's all, and even with the firewall entirely off, identical results, so there goes that argument.
And why could I not say chrome is slower? If it's slower for ME then it IS slower, you can't come tell me it's faster for me when I'm telling you it's SLOWER for ME. Also, show me some RECENT, I'm talking VERY VERY recent (such as within the last month) solid PROOF showing that chrome is actually faster as far as browsing goes... And not just some one site's/kid's little blog or video or anything, real proof.
I don't know browser security? What do YOU know about it? Most likely nothing... And making a comeback to what? You've said nothing other than "blarrr chrome fast!!! hurr chrome safe!!" with no proof of such.
And again, you're showing how little you know about this by saying that IE is unsafe just because it's popular. You obviously know nothing about what you argue about, IE is unsafe because of it's CRAPPY CODING, there are major flaws in it that ALLOW these exploits... Flaws that are so big that microsoft can't even patch them, if they wish to get rid of them they have to literally recode IE from scratch... Seriously, go read some shit before trying to argue something.




Reply With Quote