Like I said earlier (which you I guess didn't bother to read), I use BOTH and see no improvement in Chrome's speed. I'm not like you who most likely on uses the one browser and is just screaming "Hurrr chrome is faster dah googles told meh!!!! Hurrhurr dey rewrote da java stuffs!@!@"
And how is it safer? They're both open source, both are as vulnerable as the next... And considering that FireFox gets A LOT more updates, any security flaws that are ever found are patched extremely quickly, firefox is in no way 'unsafe'... So obviously, you DON'T know what you're talking about.
But I guess if you're definition of safe is "sending all my info to google" then you're right...? Again, you're a dumbass if you use chrome, and don't really know shit about what you're talking about... AT LEAST use iron.

Sorry bud, I argue when I'm right. But nice attempt at trying to get me to shut up?

Edit: Oh and for the record, just to back up my own arguments (for my own sake, obviously this isn't any solid proof), Loaded up both chrome and firefox, brought them both to google, then tested each one. I went to a site that I hadn't been to, so no cache or anything of the sort... Firefox took around 1 second to fully load & display it, whereas chrome took around 2.5, so please move along, thanks.