Who said anything about 'on foot'?Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
Printable View
Who said anything about 'on foot'?Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
Mkay, so how else would you manage? Don't forget all this was under the circumstance that all the countries stopped supporting each other (otherwise you would have never attacked Canada).Quote:
Originally Posted by Pain_ELementaL
So what are you gonna use? Bicycles? Roller blades? You won't be finding fuel in the middle of Canada, so cars, planes, or anything else is out of the question.
Ha, I'm not keeping any of that in mind. The scenario changed when you said the US couldn't take over Canada or Mexico. The whole 'countries working on their own' was a scenario of the past, and you know it sucka.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
We'll be taking our fuel-powered vehicles now.
LOLOL wow, you ARE stupid. Nothing ever changed. That was the point, you said the US would take over Canada and Mexico if all countries stopped supporting each other. AND YOU KNOW IT SUCKA!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Pain_ELementaL
Show me where I said that, I'd love to see.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
And you have no place to call me stupid, as I'm farther and more successful than you'll ever be. Enjoy endless nights of 4chan for the rest of your life.
Lolol keep telling yourself that to help you sleep at night.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pain_ELementaL
i dont think i should get involved but i read all 13 F-ing PAGES OF THIS THREAD
and i want to point a few things out
WIY you were geting somewere with the "on foot" idea
it is a fact that the world is going to run out of oil in a few decades(dont remember how many)
so Russia the USA's #1 enemy is not attacking the USA because Russia knows that
1. blowing up all of America is a waste of fuel because you dont gain anything from it(The USA isnt fighting them right now why waste fuel on blowing up a "super power" THAT U COULD USE).
2. The USA is to powerful to be taken over by force.
3. Russia has other problems to deal with and so does the USA.
China supplies the USA with almost EVERYTHING at a cheap price,
if you attack china your economy drops 75% MINIMUM
and even if you take over Canada and Mexico
HOW IN THE HELL ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE OVER THE REST OF THE WORLD WHEN YOU OUT OF RESOURCES
sure you'll probably drop a few nukes on the earth, but NO ONE CAN RULE THE WORLD (as of today) SO WHY IS THE USA ANY DIFFERENT ???????
WIY, your failing.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
how about a nitrogen powered car? they exist. they are not marketed because nitrogen is super flammable, unlike gas which is flammable, but nitrogen could take out a whole road in a car crash. but that out of mind, NO ONE needs to support you in the effort of getting it. you can do it your self, at home if you have the proper equipment. like pain said, soaring un employment and people will risk it for some money and food for there family's. and the only way that is kind of probable to take down america would be get china to claim our debt. but honestly good luck with that, were strong and would shut them down. then your going to make the argument america isnt the strongest. then ill tell you too fuck your self, i didnt see people fleeing from euro and coming to canada? why? canada sucks, youve got nothing there. free healthcare? whoopty fuckin doo, you get you free health care AFTER you make an appointment, so fuck your health care.
Whoa whoa now, I never said US could take over the entire world by itself...that would be stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by supafly12
Too long didn't read.
Congrats. You just proved you're smarter than everyone else in this thread. haha.Quote:
Originally Posted by xWhite_Shadowx
Lmao scruffy you're a fucking idiot, seriously. Didn't even read the thread then you come running your mouth. I said US was the strongest, not that they're not, so stfu if you're not gonna read properly... And your little car thing, build a car and take pics, leme know how it works out for you, kthx.
You also fail for thinking this is a Canada vs US thread. Your post makes you just as bad as Pain if not worse... Again, have fun with your little military.
There are cars that run on nitrogen, hell there's cars that can run on vegetable oil. Why you're telling Scruff to build his own and take pics...I have no idea. Being able to build your own car is not a requirement to drive it.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
"you can do it yourself at home if you have the proper equipment"
That's why...
And whether they're aquirable or not means nothing, not every family in the US will be getting their hands on one.
dude alot of other countries in europe and the middle east already have cars that run on natural gas.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
these cars where made to run on gasoline but the put a natural gas tank in there trunk and yo buy this gas reductor thats like 100$ and blast that gas straight into your engine(you can put a switch in the car to switch from natural gas to gasoline)
hell you could even do it on a HUMMER!!!!
they just dont crash like the ppl in the US do....
1) Key part of that is "in europe"Quote:
Originally Posted by supafly12
2) Natural gas is still fuel. You can only bring so much with you.
i have to say... this thread has alot of diff topics xD. love you guys yall crack me up
"If you have the proper equipment". Of course a 16 year old kid isn't going to have this.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
Being aquirable is everything. It's a good thing it doesn't matter if every family in the US can get their hands on one...since the issue at hand is traversing Canada after we take it over...remember?
[ Holds A Spot For The Discussion To Catch Up]
http://i.imgur.com/PTTFy.gif
good old days...
Only you Goober....