Who said anything about 'on foot'?Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
Printable View
Who said anything about 'on foot'?Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
Mkay, so how else would you manage? Don't forget all this was under the circumstance that all the countries stopped supporting each other (otherwise you would have never attacked Canada).Quote:
Originally Posted by Pain_ELementaL
So what are you gonna use? Bicycles? Roller blades? You won't be finding fuel in the middle of Canada, so cars, planes, or anything else is out of the question.
Ha, I'm not keeping any of that in mind. The scenario changed when you said the US couldn't take over Canada or Mexico. The whole 'countries working on their own' was a scenario of the past, and you know it sucka.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
We'll be taking our fuel-powered vehicles now.
LOLOL wow, you ARE stupid. Nothing ever changed. That was the point, you said the US would take over Canada and Mexico if all countries stopped supporting each other. AND YOU KNOW IT SUCKA!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Pain_ELementaL
Show me where I said that, I'd love to see.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
And you have no place to call me stupid, as I'm farther and more successful than you'll ever be. Enjoy endless nights of 4chan for the rest of your life.
Lolol keep telling yourself that to help you sleep at night.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pain_ELementaL
i dont think i should get involved but i read all 13 F-ing PAGES OF THIS THREAD
and i want to point a few things out
WIY you were geting somewere with the "on foot" idea
it is a fact that the world is going to run out of oil in a few decades(dont remember how many)
so Russia the USA's #1 enemy is not attacking the USA because Russia knows that
1. blowing up all of America is a waste of fuel because you dont gain anything from it(The USA isnt fighting them right now why waste fuel on blowing up a "super power" THAT U COULD USE).
2. The USA is to powerful to be taken over by force.
3. Russia has other problems to deal with and so does the USA.
China supplies the USA with almost EVERYTHING at a cheap price,
if you attack china your economy drops 75% MINIMUM
and even if you take over Canada and Mexico
HOW IN THE HELL ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE OVER THE REST OF THE WORLD WHEN YOU OUT OF RESOURCES
sure you'll probably drop a few nukes on the earth, but NO ONE CAN RULE THE WORLD (as of today) SO WHY IS THE USA ANY DIFFERENT ???????
WIY, your failing.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsYou
how about a nitrogen powered car? they exist. they are not marketed because nitrogen is super flammable, unlike gas which is flammable, but nitrogen could take out a whole road in a car crash. but that out of mind, NO ONE needs to support you in the effort of getting it. you can do it your self, at home if you have the proper equipment. like pain said, soaring un employment and people will risk it for some money and food for there family's. and the only way that is kind of probable to take down america would be get china to claim our debt. but honestly good luck with that, were strong and would shut them down. then your going to make the argument america isnt the strongest. then ill tell you too fuck your self, i didnt see people fleeing from euro and coming to canada? why? canada sucks, youve got nothing there. free healthcare? whoopty fuckin doo, you get you free health care AFTER you make an appointment, so fuck your health care.
Whoa whoa now, I never said US could take over the entire world by itself...that would be stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by supafly12
Too long didn't read.